Gold Coast CPD · Diastolic dysfunction · ~20 min · Otter transcript

Diastolic dysfunction is an echo finding — HFpEF is the clinical syndrome you treat

QCG imaging talk for GPs: how to explain “suck and push” to patients, why isolated grade 1 with a normal left atrium rarely becomes HFpEF, and why treatment is “doing the boring stuff well” — Goldilocks loop diuretics plus SGLT2 inhibitors and comorbidity control.

Theme: cinnamon · Canonical: allcpd.drkotha.com/diastolic-dysfunction

Speaker
Dr Nikki Mai (ASR: Nikki Mai / Dr May / Ni Mai) — director of cardiac imaging; cardiac CT and echo specialist. Frames diastology for the GP when the patient arrives with a report and a “so what?”
Session host / chair
QCG conference host (first name not clearly captured in this Otter slice; same weekend as cardiovascular education / cardiology subspecialties panels). Brief Q&A tail references Mona and cardio-oncology talks from the same day.
Session context
Otter id RJR657KbEI92kurGwC7G4KKG-rw · title Diastolic Dysfunction Seminar · ~20.2 min (1210 s) · 2026-02-28. Companion: cardiology-subspecialties · cardiovascular-education-weekend · cardiac-case-panel.

Key messages for GPs

Patient language: suck, push, soggy lungs

Mai opens with the consultation problem: “Mr Smith, you have diastolic dysfunction” → “So what?” His fix is physiology in plain English. The heart is a pump with two actions: it sucks (diastole — drawing blood from the lungs) and it pushes (systole). If sucking is impaired, flow into the left heart is poor, pressure backs into the lungs, the lungs get “soggy”, and the patient gets short of breath.

That story links the echo label to the symptom the patient actually cares about — and separates “is it my weight, my diastolic dysfunction, or something else?” into a shared plan rather than a mysterious report phrase.

Diastolic suck vs systolic push 1 · Suck Diastole blood from lungs 2 · Push Systole out to body If suck fails → soggy lungs
Clinic script from the talk: impaired diastolic “suck” → pulmonary congestion → breathlessness — without needing Doppler jargon at the bedside.

Echo finding ≠ HFpEF

In the echo lab, diastology is phases, flow patterns and the exam grades (1 / 2 / 3). Those grades matter to imagers; the patient wants breathlessness fixed. Clinically, diastolic dysfunction sits on a spectrum. Echo parameters set the scene — they do not automatically equal HFpEF.

Letter translation

“Normal chamber sizes, grade 1 diastolic dysfunction, no evidence of raised LV end-diastolic pressure” → usually do not refer for “diastolic dysfunction” alone. There is no clinical heart-failure syndrome to treat.

HFpEF (speaker: “heart failure with preserved systolic function”) is the clinical syndrome: exertional breathlessness, PND, peripheral oedema, LVEF typically ≥50% by volumetric analysis, plus objective raised filling pressures (echo markers, BNP, or clear clinical congestion). About half of heart failure now sits in this preserved-EF bucket; prognosis is still poor if advanced grades go untreated.

Patient myth-busting Mai uses: “EF 55% — why isn’t it 100%?” Explain stroke volume as fraction of end-diastolic volume displaced each beat — hearts are not meant to empty completely. Rough ranges he quotes: ~50% normal; 50–55% low-normal; then graded reduction.

Diastolic dysfunction to HFpEF spectrum Same spectrum — different clinical action Grade 1 DD echo finding often observe Worse DD + risk factors watch closely HFpEF symptoms + high filling pressure
Severe systolic dysfunction almost always carries diastolic dysfunction; severe diastolic dysfunction can exist with a normal EF.

Two clinic profiles

ProfileEcho / labsAction from the talk
72-year-old, murmur, no exertional limit, no diabetes/CKD Early / grade 1 DD, normal LA volume, no raised filling pressure Often aging physiology. Rare progression to HFpEF (~<5%/10 y cited) unless comorbidities appear.
78-year-old, exertional dyspnoea, ankle oedema EF 60%, moderately enlarged LA, elevated LVEDP markers, BNP high This is HFpEF — congested, needs treatment, not reassurance that “EF is fine”.

Comorbidities that sharply raise progression risk: diabetes, obesity, hypertension, kidney disease, AF. Shortness of breath is often misattributed — which is why HFpEF stays under-recognised even among specialists.

Treatment: boring stuff done well

Mai’s punchline: HFpEF care is not wires, plugs or calcified-valve theatre — it is “doing the boring stuff well.”

  1. Treat congestion first — usually a loop diuretic (frusemide). Aim for euvolemia: JVP, dry weight, ankles. Do not over-diurese — these ventricles depend on filling pressure; over-diuresis → hypotension and feeling worse after a brief “better”.
  2. Decongestion alone does not improve mortality — it makes people feel better. That is necessary but incomplete.
  3. SGLT2 inhibitors — reduce HF hospitalisation and death with or without diabetes (speaker emphasis).
  4. ACE inhibitors / antagonists used as comorbidity tools (especially BP) with variable mortality data in this space as framed in the talk.
  5. Comorbidity management + exercise training — hypertension, diabetes, obesity, CKD, AF — “things you can’t simply give a pill for.”
Goldilocks diuresis

Enough diuretic to clear lungs and oedema; not so much that preload-dependent diastole collapses into dizziness and renal hit. Reassess volume every time you titrate.

Why SGLT2 inhibitors help

Two mechanisms Mai highlights:

HFpEF treatment stack 4 · Exercise + comorbidity control (HTN · DM · obesity · CKD · AF) 3 · SGLT2 inhibitor — hospitalisation & death ↓ 2 · Loop diuretic — Goldilocks euvolemia (symptoms) “Boring stuff done well” — Mai’s GP takeaway
Symptoms first with careful diuresis; disease-modifying layer with SGLT2; lifelong risk-factor work underneath.

Clinic checklist

Related on allcpd: Cardiac case panel · Cardiology subspecialties · Cardiovascular education weekend · Atrial fibrillation · All CPD lectures

All CPD lectures · directory.drkotha.com