CPD meeting · Pain medicine & rehabilitation + Electrophysiology · ~50 min · Otter transcript

Pain management for GPs: the 4 Ps of assessment, four pillars of treatment and the 6 As of opioid review — plus an AF update

A pain and rehabilitation specialist from Southport Private offers simple frameworks for the 15-minute consult: how to tell nociceptive from neuropathic pain, when gabapentinoids and amitriptyline need care, how to document opioid decisions you can defend, and when to use a two-week inpatient pain program. In Part 2, an electrophysiologist covers anticoagulation, lifestyle, pulsed-field ablation, stopping anticoagulation after ablation, and wearables.

Theme: heather · Recorded 21 March 2026, 2:05 pm (AEST) · Canonical: allcpd.drkotha.com/pain-management-seminar

Part 1 — Pain
Pain and rehabilitation specialist (rehab physician) running the pain program at Southport Private. She introduces herself, but the name is unintelligible in the transcript (“I’m Haitian e…”), so no name is given here. She is identified by role only.
Part 2 — Atrial fibrillation
Electrophysiologist, introduced in the transcript as “Ben Hansen” (name as captured by speech recognition — spelling unverified). He has moved to an AF-only clinic and now works at Pindara five days a week.
Audience
GPs ask about opioid contracts, doctor shopping, workers’ compensation, fees, how long patients must be in sinus rhythm before stopping anticoagulation, CHA₂DS₂-VASc for device-detected AF, and a teenager with congenital heart block (Speakers 2–4, 6–8; unnamed). No sponsor or disclosure statement was captured.
Session context
Otter title Pain Management Seminar · id kPkhpVJVlHt83YKcy0fk-xg1Fs0 · ~50 min, recorded 21 March 2026 2:05 pm AEST (same CPD day as the aortic stenosis, PE, anorectal and gynaecology talks). Pain talk ~0:00–25:40; AF talk ~27:00–49:00. Slides and handouts aren’t in the recording.

Key messages for GPs

Key takeaway

The speaker’s frameworks are memory aids for a short consult. Name the pain type, ask how it is affecting the patient’s life, look for mood, sleep and trauma, and document opioid decisions against the same six headings every time.

Southport Private: mental health, rehab and pain under one roof

Assessment: the 4 Ps

Four Ps of pain assessment: Pain type, Past history and pathology, Performance and function, Psychological health Assessment: the 4 Ps P1 Pain nociceptive neuropathic nociplastic how they describe it P2 Past history & pathology liver, cardiac, age before amitriptyline / gabapentinoid (cognition, falls) P3 Performance & function how is pain changing your life? isolation, deconditioning, job, sleep, mood P4 Psychological health anxiety, depression, PTSD (hypervigilance amplifies pain) → MDT can dig deeper
The speaker’s 4 Ps (from her handout, which isn’t in the recording). She said the MDT program has the time to explore P3 and P4 more fully than a 15-minute GP consult can.

Reading the pain: nociceptive, neuropathic, central

TypeClues (as described)Note
NociceptiveBony / musculoskeletal; described as an ache; well localised.—
Neuropathic — radicularCaused by injury to a nerve (IASP definition, as stated). Low back pain with radiculopathy: a thin strip down the leg, often to the foot, or a clear dermatomal pattern; sharp, shooting, crawling sensations.Diffuse leg pain that isn’t a thin strip may come from the sacroiliac joint, hip or another musculoskeletal source.
Neuropathic — peripheral neuropathyDiffuse, glove-and-stocking distribution.Look for diabetes or vitamin deficiencies (the specific vitamin is garbled).
Central neuropathicAfter stroke or spinal cord injury.Harder to treat — involve a specialist early, before central sensitisation sets in.
NociplasticListed as the third category; not described further in the recording.—

Management: four pillars and the whole person

  1. Physical: physiotherapy, plus non-drug options such as ice packs and similar aids for low back pain (some device names are garbled).
  2. Psychological: mood, sleep and contributing comorbidities. A history of PTSD means the patient is already hypervigilant, with high sympathetic drive, and will feel more pain.
  3. Pharmacological: what most people reach for.
  4. Procedural: she does procedures too. They often get done faster than the other pillars, and patients can fixate on them and miss the whole picture.

She often draws a person with four parts — biological, psychological, social and spiritual. Usually only the biological part is being addressed. Without a whole-person approach, things decline. “Sometimes there is no problem to fix.”

Opioid review: the 6 As

Patients sometimes tell her, “My GP won’t prescribe opioids.” She acknowledged the medicolegal risk of continuing to prescribe for the wrong person as doses climb. She offered this framework to help GPs decide, and to document, whether to prescribe or decline:

Six As of opioid review arranged as a checklist: Activity, Analgesia, Adverse effects, Aberrant behaviours, Affect, Appropriate documentation The 6 As — tick each one at every opioid review A Activity Out of bed each morning, or in bed 24/7? A Analgesia Real benefit? If not, wrong drug / not opioid-responsive A Adverse effects Short- and long-term A Aberrant behaviours Taking more than prescribed? Early run-out? A Affect Drowsy? Mood? Still not functioning? A Appropriate documentation Template with ticks → defensible at audit Stable dose + better function (e.g. tramadol 50 mg mornings in a working patient, as spoken) → reasonable to continue
The speaker’s slide had a numbering slip (“there shouldn’t be a six there”), but the six headings are as above. She suggests saving them as a template or “smart text” in your clinical software.

Early run-out, contracts and doctor shopping

The two-week inpatient pain program

Why refer

Among people with chronic pain (as stated): ~74% have mental health issues, ~34% PTSD, and ~87% sleep disturbance. That is a lot to address in a GP consult, and the program is built for it.

Part 2: AF — anticoagulate, work up, modify risk

Pulsed-field ablation: same target, safer energy

Left atrium with four pulmonary veins and muscle sleeves; comparison of thermal energy (RF and cryo) risking phrenic nerve and oesophagus versus pulsed field electroporation that is cardiac-selective Pulmonary vein isolation: what changed is the energy Left atrium muscle sleeves run 4–5 cm up the veins Ring of scar at each vein ostium = isolation (~70–75% success, as stated) Thermal: radiofrequency · cryoballoon Non-specific — damages whatever it touches • Phrenic nerve palsy ~2% with cryo (usually recovers) • Atrio-oesophageal fistula — rare but often fatal Pulsed field (electroporation) Pores open in cardiac cell membranes Spares nerve, oesophagus, pericardium <30 min in left atrium · ~60 min total
Pulmonary vein isolation from the 1990s Cox maze to point-by-point radiofrequency, the cryoballoon and now PFA. The target hasn’t changed; the energy has. Figures as spoken.

Stopping anticoagulation after ablation

GP caution

This is an EP-led decision made after documented, durable success. Don’t stop a NOAC after ablation without the treating electrophysiologist’s advice.

Wearables and device-detected AF

AF Q&A: who benefits from ablation, congenital heart block

GP clinic checklist

  1. Pain consult: run the 4 Ps — type, past history, function, psychology.
  2. Thin-strip leg pain = radicular. Glove-and-stocking = peripheral neuropathy (check diabetes, vitamins). Post-stroke or spinal cord injury = refer early.
  3. Before amitriptyline or a gabapentinoid: check liver, heart, age, cognition and falls risk.
  4. Plan across physical, psychological, pharmacological and procedural pillars — not procedures alone.
  5. Every opioid review: document the 6 As (Activity, Analgesia, Adverse effects, Aberrant behaviour, Affect, Appropriate documentation).
  6. Early run-out → ask what else was tried; consider 7-day staged supply and a clear warning; check prescription monitoring.
  7. Complex chronic pain with mood, sleep or trauma issues and private cover → consider the two-week inpatient pain program (~5–6-week wait; phone if urgent).
  8. New AF: start a NOAC if indicated; FBC, kidney/liver bloods, TFTs, echo; weight loss, OSA treatment, less alcohol.
  9. Post-ablation anticoagulation decisions: EP-led, after ~12 months of durable sinus rhythm in trials.
  10. Wearable alerts: get a symptom–rhythm correlation. Low-burden device AF ≠ clinical AF for stroke risk.

Transcript caveats

Read with care

Speakers: Part 1’s pain specialist gave her name, but it is unintelligible in ASR (identified by role only). Part 2’s “Ben Hansen” is as captured by ASR; spelling unverified.
ASR: “Nausea septic” = nociceptive; “Narcos plastic” = nociplastic; “reticulocytes/reticular” = radiculopathy/radicular; “Pentagon” = probably a gabapentinoid; “state supply” = staged supply; “pingara/SOUTHCOM/Kotha/karma to publish” = garbled hospital names; “anti creatures” (OSA drug class), “blmts” (blood tests) and “maternal workers” are unclear; “foster field / pulse field” = pulsed field; “chats/Chad Basque” = CHA₂DS₂-VASc; “cardia” = KardiaMobile.
Figures as spoken only: 74% / 34% / 87%; $100 gap; ~$500 excess; ~5–6-week wait; 10% weight loss; 70–75% success; ~2% phrenic palsy; ~1/1000 and ~1/2000 for fistula; ~5.5 hours per month; $200 / $300 devices; ~10% AF over 75. Check before quoting.
Service details (fees, wait times, funding) were current at March 2026 and may have changed.
Sponsor: none stated.

Related on allcpd: Chronic pain management · Spinal pain · AF ablation seminar (PFA lab) · Aortic stenosis & TAVI (same day) · All CPD index

allcpd.drkotha.com · directory